Get by Email • RSS. A WarnerMedia Company. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. After Digital Ally resolved the issues noted in their demand letter, Jesseph and Churchwell filed suit against Digital Ally. 2, 2020 at 6:38 a.m. The two companies sold in-car video and surveillance systems. Digital Ally pushes the boundaries of technology in industries such as law enforcement, emergency management, commercial fleets, and consumer use. The district court granted Utility’s motion for summary judgment on all nine counts and denied Digital Ally’s motion for partial summary judgment. “We highly doubt the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will be similarly misled. Mr. Corum now works for plaintiff’s competitor, TASER International, Inc. It urged customers to instead purchase systems from Utility because it now owned the ’556 patent. Thereafter, Utility sent letters to potential customers (who were at that time customers of competitors), including Digital Ally, regarding the consequences of purchasing unlicensed and infringing systems. That's good news for Digital Ally, but could be very bad news for TASER. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Digital Ally, Inc. brings this lawsuit against defendant Daniel Corum, its employee. Lenexa, KS, July 25, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Digital Ally, Inc. (NASDAQ: DGLY) is pleased to announce that the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas set the final pre-trial schedule for its litigation against Axon The Company is confident the appellate court will not be similarly confused and will reverse this decision. These products work seamlessly together and are simple to install and operate. Cable News Network. Digital Ally's stock drops 17% premarket, after soaring 134.5% over the past 3 sessions Jun. About Digital AllyDigital Ally®, headquartered in Lenexa, KS, specializes in the design and manufacturing of the highest quality video recording equipment and video analytic software. under which this service is provided to you. Digital Ally shares rallied over 28% Feb. 4 following the disclosure of a contract to supply 5,000 body cameras for a three-year period to a national police force. ET by Tomi Kilgore Digital Ally, Cemtrex stocks more than double in … This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. 17-cv-02026-DDC-GLR v. DANIEL CORUM, Defendant. of Tenth Circuit opinions. Lenexa, KS, June 18, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Digital Ally, Inc. (NASDAQ: DGLY), which develops, manufactures and markets advanced video surveillance products for law enforcement, homeland security and commercial applications, announces its intent to appeal an adverse decision from the U.S. District Court for Kansas in its patent litigation with Axon. Standard & Poor's and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. Digital Ally, Inc. (NASDAQ:DGLY) has a market capitalization of $16.1 million and a float of just 5.73 million shares. ANNOUNCES FIRST QUARTER 2020 OPERATING RESULTS. Digital Ally also filed a lawsuit against WatchGuard for patent infringement in 2016 on three different patents The US Patent and Trademark Office upheld Digital Ally Inc.’s ( NASDAQ:DGLY ) intellectual property in the most recent challenges to the Lenexa, Kansas, company's patents by its competitor, taser-maker Axon Enterprise Inc. ( NASDAQ:AAXN ). Most stock quote data provided by BATS. Utility owned U.S. Patent No. Axon advanced a theory that invited the Court to commit reversible error by misinterpreting the patent claims in an effort to distinguish its own products. Importantly, the Court’s ruling did not find that Digital’s ‘452 Patent was invalid. This makes it a frequent subject of day-trading chat rooms and frequent jumps in … DIGITAL ALLY, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, … Digital Ally pushes the boundaries of technology in industries such as law enforcement, emergency management, commercial fleets, and consumer use. Call 800.440.4947 for information about body cams, in-car video systems, data solutions and support for Law Enforcement, EMS, Commercial Fleets and more. Axon simply called the lawsuit frivolous. Chicago Mercantile Association: Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. Their sole claim for relief was a cause of action titled "Attorneys Fees." Digital Ally also accused Axon of engaging in improper, unethical and unfair competitive practices. A wide variety of factors that may cause actual results to differ from the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will rule in the Company’s favor in its appeal; whether the Company will ultimately prevail in its patent litigation against Axon and achieve its objectives; competition from larger, more established companies with far greater economic and human resources; the effect of changing economic conditions; its ability to attract and retain customers and quality employees; and changes in government regulations, tax rates and similar matters. Follow additional Digital Ally Inc. social media channels here: Facebook I Instagram I Linkedin I Twitter, Contact InformationStanton Ross, CEOTom Heckman, CFODigital Ally, Inc913-814-7774. The reader should consider statements that include the words "believes", "expects", "anticipates", "intends", "estimates", "plans", "projects", "should", or other expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events or trends, to be uncertain and forward-looking. However, Axon has … Market indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. DIGITAL ALLY, INC., Plaintiff, Case No. “We are certainly disappointed with the Court’s misreading of our patent rights, but we remain confident that the ruling will be reversed on appeal,” said Digital Ally’s CEO, Stanton Ross. These cautionary statements should not be construed as exhaustive or as any admission as to the adequacy of the Company's disclosures. The Court Unfortunately Accepted Axon’s Error in Narrowing Digital’s Patent Claims. Subscribe to Justia's Free Summaries 6,381,556 (the ’556 patent) by purchasing the patent and other assets in January 2013 from a supplier of in-car mobile surveillance systems. Do Not Sell, Digital Ally Intends to Appeal Adverse Decision in Litigation with Axon, Why it's time for investors to go on defense, Premarket: 7 things to know before the bell, Barnes & Noble stock soars 20% as it explores a sale, SoftBank and Toyota want driverless cars to change the world, Why it's time for investors to go on the defense. Unfortunately, the Court accepted Axon’s view and dismissed the lawsuit on this basis. If you had a motor vehicle repossessed by Ally Financial Inc. ("Ally"), a class action lawsuit may affect your rights. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship. Shares of Digital Ally, Inc. (NASDAQ: DGLY ), a provider of video recording and analytical software, have been on a roller coaster ride since the start of February. This lawsuit asserts infringement of Digital Ally's U.S. Patent No. WestPark Capital analyst, Ishfaque Faruk, hypothesized that even if Digital Ally won the patent infringement lawsuit, Axon would either buy the smaller company or license its technology. 2, 2020 at 6:38 a.m. The PTAB instituted a review of Claims 1– 7 and 9–25 and determined that Claims 1–7, 9, 10, and 12–25 were unpatentable, and that Claim 11 was not shown to be unpatentable. It also did not address any other issue, such as whether Digital’s requested damages were appropriate, and it does not impact the Company’s ability to file additional lawsuits to hold other competitors accountable for patent infringement. Plaintiff-Appellant Digital Ally, Inc. appealed a district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Utility Associates, Inc. We only learned of the lawsuit by reading a Digital Ally October 28, 2013 press release. 6,381,556 (the ’556 patent) by purchasing the patent and other assets in January 2013 from a supplier of in-car mobile surveillance systems. The Tenth Circuit, in affirming the district court's judgment, concluded Digital Ally failed to sufficiently argue the issues it sought to appeal, "[t]he failure to do so amounts to a concession as to the proof.". In October 2013, Digital Ally sought a declaratory judgment of non- infringement in Kansas federal district court, but the suit was dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction over Utility. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Digital Ally, Inc. brings this lawsuit against defendant Daniel Corum, its former employee. The complainant failed to sufficiently argue the issues it sought to appeal. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Kansas, alleges Digital Ally in Johnson County has failed to pay tens of thousands of dollars in sponsorship fees as part of an agreement signed in 2015. Digital Ally pushes the boundaries of technology in industries such as law enforcement, emergency management, commercial fleets, and consumer use. This ruling solely related to a mistaken interpretation of the claims as they relate to Axon and was unrelated to the supplemental briefing Digital recently filed on its damages claim and the WatchGuard settlement. A lawsuit in Michigan pushed by allies of President Donald Trump is seeking to fight what voters decided and declare him the winner of the state's electoral votes. On June 4, 2014, Digital Ally filed this suit with the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, containing nine counts against Utility, including monopolization, false advertising, tortious interference, bad faith assertion of patent infringement, defamation and product disparagement, and trade secret misappropriation. With the final PTO decision in its pocket, Digital Ally is now filing a lawsuit against TASER for … * digital ally inc - provided an update on potential damages accruing in its patent infringement lawsuit against axon enterprise, inc. Digital Ally’s complete product solutions include in-car and body cameras, cloud and local management software, and automatic recording technology. Digital Ally’s complete product solutions include in-car and body cameras “Axon misled this Court and convinced the judge to take an overly narrow view of our patent,” continued Ross. Published on May 20, 2020. Digital Ally Forms Partnership to Provide COVID-19 Protection for First Responders Digital Ally (NASDAQ: DGLY), which develops, manufactures and markets advanced video recording products for law enforcement, emergency management, fleet safety and security, announced a partnership with De Soto, Kansas-based Trust Think Products, the exclusive distributer of the Danolyte® disinfectant. DIGITAL ALLY, INC., Plaintiff, Case No. Axon said Digital Ally purposely inflated its damage request by including sales of non-infringing products that are not a part of the lawsuit. Digital Ally, Inc. (NASDAQ: DGLY) today provided an update on the potential damages accruing in its patent infringement lawsuit against Axon Enterprise, Inc. … The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Kansas, alleges Digital Ally in Johnson County has failed to pay tens of thousands of dollars in sponsorship fees as part of an agreement signed in 2015. In May 2013, Digital Ally filed a petition for inter partes review with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to determine the validity of all claims on the ’556 patent. Digital Ally never contacted us before filing their lawsuit to discuss their issues and concerns. Digital Ally Confident It Will Prevail in Lawsuit Against Axon Enterprise (formerly known as TASER International, Inc.) in Patent Infringement Case PRESS RELEASE GlobeNewswire Jan. 26, … The two companies sold in-car video and surveillance systems. A court authorized this notice. Lenexa, KS, July 25, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Digital Ally, Inc. (NASDAQ: DGLY) is pleased to announce that the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas set the final pre-trial schedule for its litigation against Axon Enterprise, Inc. (“Axon” formerly TASER International, Inc.).

3rd Gen 4runner Turn Signal Mod, Menards Outdoor Concrete Paint, Role Of Essential Elements In Human Body, What Does Ll Mean When Someone Dies, Virtual Tour American University,